PG&E Seeks to Spin Off its Non-nuclear Generation Assets to PG&E Subsidiary

PG&E’s Porterville Hydropower Plant. Photo courtesy of CDWR.

The perennially bankrupt PG&E has made a proposal to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to form a subsidiary with a 49% non-PG&E stake to own its non-nuclear generation assets. The reason — to raise some cash from investors in the new subsidiary.

Presumably, PG&E believes that spinning off some of the ownership of PG&E is an easier way to raise cash than just issuing corporate bonds. Who knows, they may be right.

But dealing with PG&E and how they manage their extensive fleet of dams, diversions, and powerhouses is already pretty challenging. It could be made more difficult when their fleet of hydroelectric facilities is co-owned by major investors who may bristle at undertaking investments to live up to PG&E’s environmental responsibilities.

We’ve stuck our oar in this one as part of our membership in the California Hydropower Reform Coalition with an accepted motion to intervene in the CPUC preceding. So, stay tuned.

Ron Stork

Ron is a national expert in flood management, federal water resources development, hydropower reform, and Wild & Scenic Rivers. He joined Friends of the River as Associate Conservation Director in 1987 and became its Senior Policy Advocate in 1995. 

Ron was presented the prestigious River Conservationist of the Year award by Perception in 1996 for his work to stop the Auburn dam. In 2004, he received the California Urban Water Conservation Council’s Excellence Award for statewide and institutional innovations in water conservation.

Previous
Previous

State Water Resources Control Board Wakes Up

Next
Next

California Water Rights are Largely Held by White Men